<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RCA ANT2000 Indoor Amplified SMART Digital Flat Antenna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/</link>
	<description>Guide for Digital to Analog TV Converters &#38; Antennas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:08:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-116</guid>
		<description>This antenna is crap.
My $11.99 budget antenna Catalog #15-1874 from Radio Shack worked better, getting all my locals.  This pos didn&#039;t even pick up half of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This antenna is crap.<br />
My $11.99 budget antenna Catalog #15-1874 from Radio Shack worked better, getting all my locals.  This pos didn&#8217;t even pick up half of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antenna_seeker</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>antenna_seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-101</guid>
		<description>The last review was 6-7 months ago.  I wonder how this RCA Smart Antenna is working for people now that more stations have switched to digital?

I was looking for RCA because I have an old RCA &quot;amplified rabbit ears&quot; from Walmart and it gets more digital channels than the old &quot;amplified Sony rabbit ears&quot; that I have.  So I was going to look for an RCA &quot;digital antenna&quot; (and one of my DTV boxes does have the &quot;smart port&quot;/ie, the Tivax STB8 box).

But after reading these reviews, I dunno.... It doesn&#039;t sound too promising.

Antennaweb.org says I need an &quot;Amplified MEDIUM Multi-Directional Antenna&quot; but I can&#039;t find one that says &quot;MEDIUM.&quot;  

All this digital mess is the most frustrating thing.  Plain Ol&#039; TV as it was was FINE with me.  ;-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last review was 6-7 months ago.  I wonder how this RCA Smart Antenna is working for people now that more stations have switched to digital?</p>
<p>I was looking for RCA because I have an old RCA &#8220;amplified rabbit ears&#8221; from Walmart and it gets more digital channels than the old &#8220;amplified Sony rabbit ears&#8221; that I have.  So I was going to look for an RCA &#8220;digital antenna&#8221; (and one of my DTV boxes does have the &#8220;smart port&#8221;/ie, the Tivax STB8 box).</p>
<p>But after reading these reviews, I dunno&#8230;. It doesn&#8217;t sound too promising.</p>
<p>Antennaweb.org says I need an &#8220;Amplified MEDIUM Multi-Directional Antenna&#8221; but I can&#8217;t find one that says &#8220;MEDIUM.&#8221;  </p>
<p>All this digital mess is the most frustrating thing.  Plain Ol&#8217; TV as it was was FINE with me.  ;-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-70</guid>
		<description>cannot locate retailer in houston, tx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cannot locate retailer in houston, tx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an anonymous customer</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>an anonymous customer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Works Great&lt;/strong&gt;

Product work well (in Downtown San Diego), with one exception - no channel for CBS. Got all the other channels, even some digital channels, but no CBS. Will continue to use SMART antenna until a better, more permanent solution can be afforded. I would recommend purchasing this product.

Recommends this product? Yes
Age: 45 - 54
Gender: Male
Has owned product for: 2 - 7 weeks
Uses product: Every day

&lt;em&gt;Source: Walmart&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Works Great</strong></p>
<p>Product work well (in Downtown San Diego), with one exception &#8211; no channel for CBS. Got all the other channels, even some digital channels, but no CBS. Will continue to use SMART antenna until a better, more permanent solution can be afforded. I would recommend purchasing this product.</p>
<p>Recommends this product? Yes<br />
Age: 45 &#8211; 54<br />
Gender: Male<br />
Has owned product for: 2 &#8211; 7 weeks<br />
Uses product: Every day</p>
<p><em>Source: Walmart</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Bragg "bright star"</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Bragg "bright star"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-33</guid>
		<description>advertised as a &quot;smart antenna&quot;. I could tell only a slight difference in this an the 1500 which is not a smart antenna

&lt;em&gt;Source: Amazon&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>advertised as a &#8220;smart antenna&#8221;. I could tell only a slight difference in this an the 1500 which is not a smart antenna</p>
<p><em>Source: Amazon</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Best SMART Antenna made&lt;/strong&gt;

Only works with converter boxes (TV&#039;s will have them in 2009) that have the SMART Antenna connector (looks like off set phone jack). I found the Quick search was best to start with to find the best placement, then the LONG Full Search (1hour!) locked in reception. Not as subject to interference as rabbit ears with RCA DTA800 was. I have tried over 10 other antennae and this one is BEST

&lt;em&gt;Source: Buy.com&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Best SMART Antenna made</strong></p>
<p>Only works with converter boxes (TV&#8217;s will have them in 2009) that have the SMART Antenna connector (looks like off set phone jack). I found the Quick search was best to start with to find the best placement, then the LONG Full Search (1hour!) locked in reception. Not as subject to interference as rabbit ears with RCA DTA800 was. I have tried over 10 other antennae and this one is BEST</p>
<p><em>Source: Buy.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Great SMART Antenna&lt;/strong&gt;

Only works with converter boxes (TV&#039;s will have them in 2009) that have the SMART Antenna connector (looks like off set phone jack). I found the Quick search was best to start with to find the best placement, then the LONG Full Search (1hour!) locked in reception. Not as subject to interference as rabbit ears with RCA DTA800 was. I have tried over 10 other antennae and this one is BEST 

Recommends this product? Yes
Age: 45 - 54
Gender: Male
Has owned product for: 2 - 7 weeks
Uses product: Every day

&lt;em&gt;Source: Walmart&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great SMART Antenna</strong></p>
<p>Only works with converter boxes (TV&#8217;s will have them in 2009) that have the SMART Antenna connector (looks like off set phone jack). I found the Quick search was best to start with to find the best placement, then the LONG Full Search (1hour!) locked in reception. Not as subject to interference as rabbit ears with RCA DTA800 was. I have tried over 10 other antennae and this one is BEST </p>
<p>Recommends this product? Yes<br />
Age: 45 &#8211; 54<br />
Gender: Male<br />
Has owned product for: 2 &#8211; 7 weeks<br />
Uses product: Every day</p>
<p><em>Source: Walmart</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/rca-ant2000-indoor-amplified-smart-digital-flat-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalconverterreview.com/?p=64#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Better than Rca Ant 1500, but not as good as expected. It&#039;s still position sensitive. Picture quality
depends on where you place it. Some location gives
stronger signal (the strongest around 20-30). But it
works OK to get digital reception.

Recommends this product? Yes
Age: 65 or older
Gender: Male
Has owned product for: 1 week or less
Uses product: Every day

&lt;em&gt;Source: Walmart&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better than Rca Ant 1500, but not as good as expected. It&#8217;s still position sensitive. Picture quality<br />
depends on where you place it. Some location gives<br />
stronger signal (the strongest around 20-30). But it<br />
works OK to get digital reception.</p>
<p>Recommends this product? Yes<br />
Age: 65 or older<br />
Gender: Male<br />
Has owned product for: 1 week or less<br />
Uses product: Every day</p>
<p><em>Source: Walmart</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
